Cases 11 - 20 of 2,164
Montanez v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01346
Plaintiff:
Pierre A. Montanez
Defendant:
Percy Myers, Bob Blum, Angela Lankford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beatty v. Legge et al
as 1:2024cv01188
Plaintiff:
Brandon J Beatty
Defendant:
Katherine Legge, Stephanie Mitchell and Caitlyn Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
HAMILTON v. PRETORIUS
as 2:2024cv00185
Petitioner:
MITCHELL HAMILTON
Respondent:
PRETORIUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LAMPLEY v. BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
TOMMY LAMPLEY
Defendant:
BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, COMMISSIONER OF I.D.O.C., KYLE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Miles v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01285
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01288
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flakes v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2024cv01281
Plaintiff:
Thomas Flakes
Defendant:
David W. Mitchell, Michael T. Bailey, Brandon Ridgeway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01289
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01284
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01282
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
