Cases 11 - 20 of 4,000
Voight v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv00624
Plaintiff:
Matthew Steven Voight
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Logansport Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
Matthew Stephen Coleman
Defendant:
Logansport Police Department, Chris Sailors, Travis Yikes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keener v. Cork et al
as 1:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Keener
Defendant:
Melanie Cork, Samuel Keirns, Ashley Skibinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LAMPLEY v. BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
TOMMY LAMPLEY
Defendant:
BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, COMMISSIONER OF I.D.O.C., KYLE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
DeGlopper, Erica v. Jefferson County, Wisconsin et al
as 3:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Erica Merritt DeGlopper
Defendant:
Jefferson County, Wisconsin, Judge Bennett J. Brantmeier, Samuel Pennington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Willie Robinson v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
as 24-1855
Plaintiff:
WILLIE R. ROBINSON
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., ROB JEFFREYS, MATTHEW C. SWALLS and others
Matthew Coward v. Syngenta AG, et al
as 24-1867
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW COWARD
Defendant:
SYNGENTA AG, SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC and CHEVRON U.S.A., INC.
Christopher Cisco v. Sue E. Myerscough, et al
as 24-1854
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER CISCO
Respondent:
SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, SARA DARROW and COLLEEN R. LAWLESS
Interested Party:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ANDREW L. KILLIAN, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
