Cases 11 - 20 of 270
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Bradley v. Cornett et al
as 3:2024cv00059
Defendant:
Global Tel Link, T Cornett, GTL and others
Plaintiff:
Tyray A Bradley, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv50001
Defendant:
Global Tel Link Corporation, Illinois Department of Corrections, Latoya Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Nolan Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2023cv01065
Plaintiff:
Tyray A Bradley, Jr
Defendant:
Galipeau, Sonnenberg, J Farley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Pink Floyd (1987) Limited v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv14532
Plaintiff:
Pink Floyd (1987) Limited
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Gary Palmer, Gaurav Jha and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Suarez v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2023cv14156
Plaintiff:
Jose Suarez
Defendant:
State of Illinois, City of Chicago, Illinois Department of Correction's and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
