Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Fly v. Unknown Defendant
as 3:2020cv00902
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant, Joint Prisoner Transport Systems, U.S. Public Health Services and others
Plaintiff:
Toni Fly, Tony Fly, Toniya Fly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bell v. U.S. Marshall Service et al
as 1:2020cv00872
Respondent:
R.A. Heisner and U.S. Marshall Service
Petitioner:
Melvin T. Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
King et al v. U.S. Marshal Service et al
as 3:2019cv01337
Defendant:
Haley Duffy, U.S. Marshal Service, Sheriff and others
Plaintiff:
Darren Jammal King, Jamal Christopher and Denzael Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kowalski v. United States Marshall et al
as 1:2019cv02800
Defendant:
United States Marshall and U.S. Marshals Service
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Kowalski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donelson v. US Dist. Court et al
as 1:2017cv06336
Petitioner:
Joseph Donelson
Respondent:
US Dist. Court , U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dejohnette v. Indiana U.S. Marshal Services Northern District et al
as 2:2017cv00241
Defendant:
Indiana U.S. Marshal Services Northern District and Chad Kolitwenzew
Plaintiff:
Bobby Dejohnette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montague v. Hargett et al
as 1:2017cv01209
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Montague
Defendant:
Robert Hargett, All Shriner's of America, U.S. Army and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Birner v. U.S. Marshall Service
as 3:2017cv00092
Plaintiff:
Curtis W Birner
Defendant:
U.S. Marshall Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. United States et al
as 1:2016cv05858
Petitioner:
Melvin T. Bell
Respondent:
United States, United States Attorney Office and U.S. Marshall Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SWALLERS v. F.B.I. et al
as 1:2016cv00656
Defendant:
F.B.I., U.S MARSHALS SERVICE and U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE
Plaintiff:
BRENT SWALLERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
