Cases 11 - 20 of 1,675
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Payne v. Washington et al
as 1:2024cv03710
Petitioner:
Kraig Payne
Respondent:
. Washington, . Leflare and . Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOKE v. MILLER et al
as 4:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
SAMANTHA COOKE
Defendant:
SHERIFF BRENT MILLER, CHIEF DEPUTY BRADLEY SHEPHERD, JAIL COMMANDER BRADLEY SEACAT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. CMHC
as 3:2024cv01228
Plaintiff:
Jacob Washington
Defendant:
CMHC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. Washington et al
as 1:2024cv01174
Plaintiff:
Kraig Payne
Defendant:
. Washington, . Leflare and . Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Washington v. Bermingham et al
as 2:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Washington
Defendant:
Bermingham, Koselke and Abram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FEY v. WASHINGTON et al
as 4:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR WAYNE FEY
Defendant:
WASHINGTON and STEVE BUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANR Pipeline Company v. 1.92 Acres More or Less in Washington County Wisconsin et al
as 2:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
ANR Pipeline Company
Defendant:
1.92 Acres More or Less in Washington County Wisconsin and Germantown Land LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
ANR Pipeline Company v. 3.96 Acres More or Less in Washington County Wisconsin et al
as 2:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
ANR Pipeline Company
Defendant:
3.96 Acres More or Less in Washington County Wisconsin and Thomas A Okruhlica
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
