Cases 21 - 30 of 78
Nichols v. Ray et al
as 2:2020cv02055
Defendant:
. Belcher, Sunni Delahunty, Danae Ray and others
Plaintiff:
James A Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miranda Chaudhry v. Amazon.com, Incorporated, et al
as 20-1315
Defendant / Appellee:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES INC., MIKE FLANNERY, LATANYA GAINES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIRANDA D. CHAUDHRY
Walls v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv00877
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Illinois Court Commission, Lawana Jones-Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Dena Walls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gudger v. The State of Illinois et al
as 1:2019cv08286
Defendant:
Jovan J Gudger, John Baird, Kerry Donnelly and others
Plaintiff:
Lynwellyn H Gudger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miranda Chaudhry v. Amazon.com, Inc., et al
as 19-3442
Defendant / Appellee:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES INC., MIKE FLANNERY, LATANYA GAINES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIRANDA D. CHAUDHRY
Davis v. Buffett et al
as 2:2019cv02332
Defendant:
S E Flannery, Roger Pope, Jr and Howard G Buffett
Plaintiff:
Freddie L Davis, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mahan v. Heatherton et al
as 2:2019cv02279
Defendant:
Dana Ray, . Belcher, Decatur Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley Lynn Mahan, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young, Sean v. Schwenn, Heather et al
as 3:2019cv00742
Defendant:
Sgt. Scott, Douglas G. Percy, Gary Boughton and others
Not Yet Classified:
WSPF Prison Facility
Plaintiff:
Sean M. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chaudhry v. Amazon.com Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05659
Defendant:
Mike Flannery, Amazon.Com, Inc., Latanya Gaines and others
Plaintiff:
Miranda D. Chaudhry
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Staten, Deshaun v. Adams, Jamie et al
as 3:2019cv00512
Plaintiff:
Deshaun Staten
Defendant:
Rebecca Tracy-Feldman, Sonya Anderson, Ashley Drone and others
Not Yet Classified:
WSPF Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
