Cases 21 - 30 of 120
Blue v. Eplett et al
as 2:2021cv00946
Plaintiff:
Randall Blue
Defendant:
Cheryl Eplett, Emil Toney, Jeffrey T Lawrence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Justin Douglas v. Samantha Schwartz-Oscar, et al
as 20-3489
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN L. DOUGLAS
Defendant / Appellee:
SAMANTHA SCHWARTZ-OSCAR, AMY ZIRBEL, Doctor, JAY VAN LANEN and others
Forbes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv00479
Plaintiff:
Dennis L Forbes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
John Gibens v. Indiana Department of Revenue, et al
as 20-3089
Defendant / Appellee:
CARRIE N. CRIDER, LAURA B. STAFFORD, KAREN D. SZUMLANDSKI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN E. GIBENS
Andre Forbes v. USA
as 20-2595
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDRE A. FORBES
Alvin Williams v. Chad Brown, et al
as 20-1858
Defendant / Appellee:
KELLY DAVIDSON, LIEUTENANT FORBES, ABERARDO SALINAS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALVIN WILLIAMS
Walker v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2020cv01156
Defendant:
. Davis, . Starkey, . Pierce and others
Plaintiff:
DeMarco Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forbes v. Menards et al
as 2:2020cv00081
Defendant:
Doe 1 and Menards
Plaintiff:
Eric Forbes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanchez v. Robinson et al
as 2:2019cv02298
Defendant:
CO Ramone Robinson, CO Smith, Warden Teri Kennedy and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibens et al v. United States Congress et al
as 2:2019cv00191
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service, Hoist Liftruck Mfg LLC, Woodforest National Bank and others
Defendant:
Premier Credit of North America LLC, Porter County Circuit Court Judge Pro Tem, Carrie N Crider and others
Plaintiff:
Reactive Power LLC and John Gibens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
