Cases 21 - 30 of 1,060
Owens v. Scott et al
as 3:2023cv03320
Plaintiff:
James Owens
Defendant:
. Scott, . Bradshaw, . Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Courney v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv03788
Plaintiff:
Jaleel Courney
Defendant:
Anothy Wills, La'Toya Hughes, Kelly Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott Hildreth v. Warden Wills, et al
as 23-3222
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT HILDRETH
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN WILLS, KELLY PIERCE, ADA COORDINATOR and others
Faber v. Siddiqui et al
as 3:2023cv03628
Plaintiff:
Earl Faber
Defendant:
Siddiqui, Doctor King, Dewayne Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PIERCE v. ALICEA et al
as 1:2023cv01739
Plaintiff:
RONALD J. PIERCE
Defendant:
ALEX ALICEA, JASON GRIFFITH and DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De'Adrian Boykins v. Sheri Wilson, et al
as 23-3027
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DE'ADRIAN C. BOYKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERI WILSON, MARTIAL KNIESER and DUAN PIERCE, Doctor
Pierce, Clyde v. Kijakazi, Kilolo
as 3:2023cv00764
Plaintiff:
Clyde Pierce
Defendant:
Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Stahmann v. Menzel et al
as 2:2023cv01192
Plaintiff:
Rhoda Stahmann
Defendant:
Kristin Menzel, Barbra Pierce, Michael Fink and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ORR v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01830
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, ROBERT CARTER, JACK HENDRIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Revlon Consumer Products Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv10495
Plaintiff:
Keisha Pierce
Defendant:
Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings LLC, Revlon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
