Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Monster Energy Company v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2021cv03133
Plaintiff:
Monster Energy Company
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", 012 Store, 100 cotton t-shirts Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
HATTON v. SEVIER
as 1:2021cv01431
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY N. HATTON
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HATTON v. BLACK et al
as 1:2020cv02775
Defendant:
MARSHALL COUNTY and TOM A. BLACK
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY N. HATTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HATTON v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2020cv02609
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DIVISION OF MEDICAL AND CLINICAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES and WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY N. HATTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HATTON v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00253
Plaintiff:
DONALD HATTON
Defendant:
UNIVERSAL LINEN SERVICE, LLC, EASTERN CORPORATION, ANGELA PRIFOGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Cook v. Marshall County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2019cv01410
Defendant:
Marshall County Sheriff's Department, Wayne Strawn, . Hatton and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Marshall County Sheriffs Dept. et al
as 3:2019cv01372
Defendant:
Marshall County Sheriffs Dept., Wayne Strawn and Dr. Hatton
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Hatton v. Mark Sevier
as 19-3155
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIMOTHY N. HATTON
Respondent / Appellee:
MARK R. SEVIER, Superintendent
Hatton v. Cserep
as 1:2019cv00221
Defendant:
David Cserep
Plaintiff:
Scott Alan Hatton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
