Cases 21 - 30 of 220
Adams et al v. Cook County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2023cv01390
Plaintiff:
Chatara Adams, Monica Aguilar, Carol Allen and others
Defendant:
Cook County Sheriff's Office and Cook County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Barber v. Moss et al
as 3:2023cv50063
Plaintiff:
Derrick Barber
Defendant:
Patrick Moss and C. Sword
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Cox, et al v. Jessica Barber, et al
as 23-1274
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOHN COX and SARAH DOBROZSI
Defendant / Appellant:
JESSICA BARBER, REBECCA CHAGALL, LORRAINE HARTMANN and others
USA v. David Barber
as 23-1225
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID K. BARBER
BARBER v. PARK 100 FOODS INC.
as 1:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
LABRINA BARBER
Defendant:
PARK 100 FOODS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sandress v. Serrano et al
as 1:2022cv07066
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Sandress and Dawayne Barber
Defendant:
Jose Serrano, Jonathan Serrano and Miguel Serrano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barber v. Beverly Freight, Inc.
as 1:2022cv06920
Plaintiff:
Bradley Barber
Defendant:
Beverly Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
