Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02258
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ruffin-Traylor et al v. Butler et al
as 2:2019cv01521
Defendant:
Mary Lemmenes, Karen Lind Butler, Visiting Nurse Community Care Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Natalie Ruffin-Traylor
Not Yet Classified:
Andrea Palm and Alex M Azar, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
A.N. Webber Logistics, Inc. v. CK Logistics, Inc.
as 1:2019cv05642
Plaintiff:
A.N. Webber Logistics, Inc.
Defendant:
CK LOGISTICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00269
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
McAllister v. CKS Financial LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00094
Plaintiff:
Dustin McAllister and Michelle O'Laire
Defendant:
CKS Financial LLC , John and Jane Does and Webcollex LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Miller v. CK Products LLC
as 1:2017cv00314
Plaintiff:
Deberah Miller
Defendant:
CK Products LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sanchez-Lagunes v. CK Richton Park, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02504
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Sanchez-Lagunes
Defendant:
CK Richton Park, Inc. and Constantine Kanavos
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. CKS Woodworks, Inc.
as 1:2017cv01067
Plaintiff:
Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Apprentice Training Fund and others
Defendant:
CKS Woodworks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv09216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
