Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Choe v. Singh et al
as 2:2020cv00488
Defendant:
US Postal Service, Iqbal Singh, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Chong Choe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Lee v. Carr
as 2:2020cv01637
Defendant:
Kevin A Carr
Plaintiff:
Chong L Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kim et al v. H Guys, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv03588
Plaintiff:
Douglas Kim, George Kim, Michael Kim and others
Defendant:
Steve H Chong, Megan M. Chong, H Guys, LLC Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee v. Appleton Police Department et al
as 2:2020cv00765
Defendant:
Cary Meyer, DA Carrie Schneider, Neal Rabas and others
Plaintiff:
Chong L Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chong Lee v. Tammy Devries
as 19-3018
Defendant / Appellee:
TAMMY DEVRIES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHONG L. LEE
Swart et al v. City of Chicago
as 1:2019cv06213
Plaintiff:
Caeden Hood, Jeremy Chong, Matt Swart and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Choe v. Singh et al
as 2:2019cv00348
Plaintiff:
Chong Choe
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Commercial Market, United States Postal Service, Iqbal Singh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
H Guys, LLC v. The Halal Guys Franchise, Inc.
as 1:2019cv04974
Plaintiff:
The Halal Guys Franchise, Inc. and H Guys, LLC
Counter Defendant:
Steven Chong and Megan Chong
3Rd Party Defendant:
Vincent Tan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Lee v. Devries et al
as 2:2018cv00580
Plaintiff:
Chong L Lee
Defendant:
Tammy Devries and Michael Bernstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bose Corporation v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2017cv06463
Plaintiff:
Bose Corporation
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", ZHAOYUN04FEI , powerproaudio* and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
