Cases 21 - 30 of 424
Johnson v. Facebook et al
as 2:2023cv01142
Plaintiff:
Robert W Johnson
Defendant:
Facebook, Meta, Rudy Giuliani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. FACEBOOK et al
as 1:2023cv01560
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
FACEBOOK, META, RUDY GUILIANI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lipscomb v. Rice et al
as 3:2023cv02800
Plaintiff:
Keon V. Lipscomb
Defendant:
Rice, C/O Hampton, Anthony Wills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Othman v. Cagababanua et al
as 1:2023cv05455
Plaintiff:
Abed Othman
Defendant:
Cagababanua, Matthew Cobble, J. Mueller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wisnefski v. Mickey Group Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04984
Plaintiff:
Michael Wisnefski
Defendant:
Mickey Group Inc. and Alex Rabens
Interpleader:
Hampton Lumber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Hampton v. Jefferys et al
as 3:2023cv03238
Plaintiff:
Deon Hampton
Defendant:
Rob Jefferys, Latoya Hughes, . Case and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. City of Loves Park Illinois et al
as 3:2023cv50273
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE ANTON HAMPTON
Defendant:
CITY OF LOVES PARK ILLINOIS, WINNEBAGO COUNTY ILLINOIS, CITY OF LOVES PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
USA v. Deangelo Hampton
as 23-2386
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DEANGELO HAMPTON
Hampton v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00558
Petitioner:
James B Hampton
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HAMPTON v. AMERICREW, INC.
as 4:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
JASON HAMPTON
Defendant:
AMERICREW, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
