Cases 21 - 30 of 28,618
Mata v. Amazon
as 3:2024cv50205
Plaintiff:
Christian J Mata
Defendant:
Amazon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Union Labor Life Insurance Company, The v. Finney et al
as 3:2024cv50208
Plaintiff:
Union Labor Life Insurance Company, The
Defendant:
Heather Kathleen Finney, Jamie L. Branch, Royce Branch and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Risper, Michael v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue et al
as 3:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Michael Risper, Jr.
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Revenue, Dana J. Erlandson and Susan Dukes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PAYNE v. WADAS
as 2:2024cv00237
Petitioner:
JAMES PAYNE
Respondent:
J. WADAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
SHIPLEY v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
ALYSSA SHIPLEY
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wells v. Veradigm Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04453
Plaintiff:
Juliet Wells
Defendant:
Veradigm Inc., Elizabeth A Altman, P. Gregory Garrison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Lujano v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04450
Plaintiff:
Mirna Lujano
Defendant:
Commissoner Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bendel v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
Ann Bendel
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
PETERON v. PLAINFIELD CORRECTION WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00914
Plaintiff:
CAMERONS PETERON
Defendant:
PLAINFIELD CORRECTION WARDEN, FLOWER'S DORM REP, CO'S and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPEECH FIRST, INC v. WHITTEN et al
as 1:2024cv00898
Plaintiff:
SPEECH FIRST, INC
Defendant:
PAMELA WHITTEN, LAMAR HYLTON, KATHY ADAMS RIESTER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
