Cases 21 - 30 of 4,656
Winston v. Schmidt et al
as 4:2024cv04099
Plaintiff:
Andre Winston
Defendant:
Elizabeth Schmidt, . Jumper, . Carreon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ridley v. Vanihel et al
as 3:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Daren Earl Ridley and Daren E Ridley
Defendant:
Frank Vanihel, K Gilmore, John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kurtz et al v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
James D Kurtz and Alisanny Montero
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, Tony Evers, N7445 Racetrack Road and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04518
Defendant:
Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, Loreal USA, Inc., LOREAL USA Products, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ray v. Worden et al
as 3:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
William James Ray
Defendant:
T Worden, Snow, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dida v. Doe 1
as 3:2024cv01407
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Dida
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Bamke et al
as 2:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
Gregory Perkins
Defendant:
Aaron Bamke, Jane Doe and Gary Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Cermak Health Services et al
as 1:2024cv04522
Plaintiff:
Maurice Barnes
Defendant:
Cermak Health Services, John Doe 1, Susan Shobol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haslett v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01403
Plaintiff:
Darryl Haslett
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Jane Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gully v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01404
Plaintiff:
Brandon Gully
Defendant:
Percy Myers, Wexford Health Sources Inc and Jane Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
