Cases 21 - 30 of 6,180
Means v. Pegan et al
as 1:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Robert Means
Defendant:
Brandon Cox, CITY OF KENDALLVILLE, INDIANA, Kevin Pegan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DEPRE et al v. ROTTET et al
as 3:2024cv00127
Defendant:
DAVID ROTTET, JR. and KEVIN MOORE TRUCKING, INC.
Plaintiff:
MICKEY DEPRE and PAUL DEPRE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Zimmerman v. Carr et al
as 1:2024cv00871
Defendant:
Z Paul, Kevin A Carr, Christopher Stevens and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchell G Zimmerman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Krause et al
as 2:2024cv01117
Defendant:
Winkler, Michael Glass and Krause
Plaintiff:
Kevin Joseph Washington, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv08024
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv08045
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07967
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Keeler v. Cook County
as 1:2024cv05605
Respondent:
Kathleen Marie Burke, . Gallagher, Hickory Hills Police Department and others
Petitioner:
Kevin Keeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00426
Defendant:
JACK HENDRIX, MATTHEW LEOHR, JACQUELYNNE PORTER and others
Plaintiff:
DION JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01099
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
