Cases 21 - 30 of 34
CARLOCK et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2013cv01032
Defendant:
RYAN ASHER, PAUL CIESIELSKI, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES A. CARLOCK and PATRIC MCDOWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Clark v. Hardy et al
as 1:2012cv01385
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Clark
Defendant:
Marcus Hardy, Lisa Madigan and Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Hardy et al
as 1:2012cv07262
Petitioner:
Robert M. Clark
Respondent:
Marcus Hardy and Lisa Madigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clark et al v. Village of Lyons et al
as 1:2011cv06895
Plaintiff:
Richard M. Clark, Charles E. Alexander and Eugene Eddy
Defendant:
Village of Lyons, D. Dyas, R. Wiggins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Holm et al v. Clark et al
as 1:2011cv01798
Plaintiff:
Nick W Holm and Daniel M. Holm
Defendant:
Jason M Clark , Sheldon R. Sobol , Ryan Gasteier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Walker et al
as 3:2010cv00579
Plaintiff:
Matthew L Benson
Defendant:
Roger E. Walker, Jr., John D Evans, Harold H Schuler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Walker et al
as 3:2010cv03192
Plaintiff:
Matthew L Benson
Defendant:
Roger E. Walker, Jr., John D Evans, Harold H Schuler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Astrue
as 2:2010cv00037
Plaintiff:
Janice M Clark
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue and Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Walker v. Clark et al
as 3:2010cv03007
Plaintiff:
Chad Walker
Defendant:
Amy M Clark, Eugene McAdory, Larry J Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
