Cases 21 - 30 of 4,004
Keener v. Cork et al
as 1:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Keener
Defendant:
Melanie Cork, Samuel Keirns, Ashley Skibinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LAMPLEY v. BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
TOMMY LAMPLEY
Defendant:
BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, COMMISSIONER OF I.D.O.C., KYLE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
DeGlopper, Erica v. Jefferson County, Wisconsin et al
as 3:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Erica Merritt DeGlopper
Defendant:
Jefferson County, Wisconsin, Judge Bennett J. Brantmeier, Samuel Pennington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAUDERDALE v. DELAWARE COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
LAMONE LAUDERDALE
Defendant:
DELAWARE COUNTY, TONY SKINNER, SHERIFF, CANTEEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Willie Robinson v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
as 24-1855
Plaintiff:
WILLIE R. ROBINSON
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., ROB JEFFREYS, MATTHEW C. SWALLS and others
Robinson v. Wexford Health Source et al
as 3:2024cv01013
Plaintiff:
Willie Robinson
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source, Rob Jeffries, Matthew Swalls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Cisco v. Sue E. Myerscough, et al
as 24-1854
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER CISCO
Respondent:
SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, SARA DARROW and COLLEEN R. LAWLESS
Interested Party:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ANDREW L. KILLIAN, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Ramon Alvarado, Jr. v. Matthew Burns, et al
as 24-1834
Plaintiff:
RAMON ALVARADO, JR.
Defendant:
MATTHEW BURNS, CYNTHIA RADTKE, Captain, JEREMY WESTRA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
