Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Juan Guitron, Jr. v. Michael Paul, et al
as 11-2718
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUAN J. GUITRON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL PAUL, Correctional Officer at Dodge Correctional Institution and BRADLEY MLODZIK, Lieutenant
Nolan v. Astrue
as 2:2011cv00692
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Nolan
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Van Meter v. Reteke et al
as 3:2011cv00289
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Van Meter
Defendant:
Clair Reteke, Mark Sevier, Sally Stevenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN METER v. RETEKE et al
as 1:2011cv00848
All Are Sued In Their Individual And Official Capacitie:
CHARLES A. PENFOLD
Defendant:
CLAIR RETEKE, MARK SEVIER and SALLY STEVENSON
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PAUL VAN METER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Van Meter v. Indiana State of
as 4:2011cv00031
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Van Meter
Defendant:
Indiana State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guitron v. Paul et al
as 1:2011cv00447
Plaintiff:
Juan Jorge Guitron, Jr
Defendant:
Michael Paul and Bradley Mlodzik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Meter v. Myers et al
as 4:2010cv00030
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Van Meter
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Linda Frye and Kimberly Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kott v. Astrue
as 2:2010cv00246
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Kott
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gilmore et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv00986
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Gilmore, Carol Buffo, Daniel Duran and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare LLC and Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
VAN METER v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2009cv01220
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PAUL VAN METER
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT and LINDA VAN NATTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
