Cases 21 - 30 of 100
GREGORY v. BYRD et al
as 2:2020cv00445
Defendant:
BYRD, MICHAEL SMITH, K. HOBSON and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL K GREGORY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAUDERDALE-EL v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2020cv00486
Defendant:
KEITH HARTZELL, CORIZON CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES, SUSAN SMOOTHERY and others
Plaintiff:
LAMONE LAUDERDALE-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKenzie v. The United States
as 3:2020cv50249
Plaintiff:
Victoria C. McKenzie
Defendant:
The United States, Jaclyn Rogers, Stephen E. Balogh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
TOMEY v. RAJOLI et al
as 2:2020cv00323
Defendant:
L. RANDOLPH, SAMUEL BYRD, BREANNA TRIMBLE and others
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY TOMEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. MILLER et al
as 1:2020cv00098
Defendant:
M. SKAGGS, B. MILLER, D. ALEXANDER and others
Plaintiff:
M. SMITH and MICHAEL SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. TALBOT et al
as 1:2019cv05043
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC, P. TALBOT and K. PRYOR
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christian Dior Couture, S.A. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv04908
Plaintiff:
Christian Dior Couture, S.A.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Li Chen, 454ngyu and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Gregory v. Byrd et al
as 3:2019cv00507
Defendant:
Byrd, Wexford (?) Medical, Michael Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Michael K Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Engelage et al
as 3:2019cv00713
Defendant:
Frank Lawrence, Joshua A. Schoenbeck, Reviewing Officer and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRUITT v. SMITH et al
as 2:2019cv00164
Defendant:
PEREZ, OMAR AHMAD, DIVISION OF CLINICAL HEALTH CARE and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND PRUITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
