Cases 21 - 30 of 201
United States of America v. Norwood
as 1:2022cv03780
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Deronarte Norwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Armstrong v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv03123
Plaintiff:
KENDALL A. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
The City of Chicago, Officer Julio Rodriguez III, Star No. 19144, Officer John Norwood Jr., Star No. 15471 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Norwood v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv03073
Plaintiff:
Larry T. Norwood
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Director Wilensky, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NORWOOD v. BYRD et al
as 2:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
ANDREW DAVID NORWOOD
Defendant:
BYRD and DR. RAJOLI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00849
Plaintiff:
Bryant P. Norwood and Bryant P Norwood
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Placht v. Argent Trust Company
as 1:2021cv05783
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Placht
Defendant:
Argent Trust Company, Jill Krueger, Thomas Noesen, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Lieble v. Hill-Rom Holdings Inc et al
as 1:2021cv05681
Plaintiff:
Chris Lieble
Defendant:
Hill-Rom Holdings Inc, John P Groetelaars, William G. Dempsey and others
Norwood v. Sheriff of Kane County Hain et al
as 1:2021cv05278
Plaintiff:
Randy Norwood
Defendant:
Sheriff of Kane County Hain, Kane County, Illinois, C. Conklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jor-El Tristen Norwood v. Troy Plos, et al
as 21-2810
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOR-EL TRISTEN NORWOOD
Defendant / Appellee:
TROY PLOS and CHRISTOPHER SALDANA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
