Cases 21 - 30 of 99
Pike v. Rettig et al
as 1:2021cv01259
Plaintiff:
Rashon Markell Pike
Defendant:
Charles Rettig, Unknown, Timothy Gribblen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pike v. Rettig et al
as 3:2021cv00959
Plaintiff:
Rashan Markell Pike
Defendant:
Charles Rettig, Unknown, Timothy Gribblen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2021cv00268
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. BAILEY, JR.
Defendant:
R. YOUNG, CHANDLER and PIKE TOWNSHIP AMBULANCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pike, Deanna v. Wisconsin Dolls LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00356
Defendant:
Wisconsin Dolls LLC and James Halbach
Plaintiff:
Deanna Pike
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
DEFFENDOLL v. PIKE COUNTY et al
as 3:2021cv00073
Defendant:
LANA GRIFFITH and PIKE COUNTY
Plaintiff:
JENNY DEFFENDOLL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
BAILEY v. INDIANAPOLIS SHERIFF TRANSPORT et al
as 1:2021cv01005
Defendant:
CHANDLER, PIKE TOWNSHIP AMBULANCE, INDIANAPOLIS SHERIFF TRANSPORT and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE BAILEY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POWELL v. PIKE TOWNSHIP TRUSTEE'S OFFICE et al
as 1:2020cv03271
Plaintiff:
CYNETHIA POWELL
Defendant:
ANNETTE M. JOHNSON and PIKE TOWNSHIP TRUSTEE'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MHG HOTELS, LLC, ET.AL., v. EMC RISK SERVICES, LLC
as 1:2020cv01620
Plaintiff:
MHG HOTELS, LLC, ET.AL.,, HOTELS OF DEERFIELD BEACH, LLC, EMERALD HOTELS INVESTMENTS, LLC and others
Defendant:
EMC RISK SERVICES, LLC and UNION INSURANCE COMPANY OF PROVIDENCE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RENDER v. PIKE COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION et al
as 3:2020cv00063
Plaintiff:
CHRIS RENDER
Defendant:
PIKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, PIKE COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION and SUZANNE BLAKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
