Cases 21 - 29 of 29
MOORE v. VILLAVICENCIO et al
as 1:2010cv00840
Defendant:
CLARION HEALTH METHODIST, RAQUEL VILLAVICENCIO and WISHARD ADVANTAGE
Plaintiff:
KEITH MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
JAMES v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2009cv01204
Plaintiff:
THOMAS M. JAMES
Defendant:
GEO GROUP, INC., JEFFREY WRIGLES, CMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Julius Johnson, Jr. v. Wishard Hand Malpractice
as 09-1340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIUS JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WISHARD HAND MALPRACTICE, $45,000,000 O.B.O.
Julius Johnson, Jr. v. Wishard Knee Malpractice
as 08-3875
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIUS JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WISHARD KNEE MALPRACTICE, $5,000,000 OBO
JOHNSON v. WISHARD KNEE MAL PRACTICE $5,000,000 OBO
as 1:2008cv01049
Plaintiff:
JULIUS JOHNSON
Defendant:
WISHARD KNEE MAL PRACTICE $5,000,000 OBO
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JOHNSON v. WISHARD
as 1:2008cv01048
Plaintiff:
JULIUS JOHNSON
Defendant:
WISHARD HAND MAL PRACTICE 45,000,000 OBO
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00951
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
EVANS v. POSKON et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2007cv00592
Defendant:
FRANK ANDERSON, JEFFREY AVINGTON, DR. JOHN BOE and others
Unknown:
Jonathan Lamont Mayes, Jonathan Lamont Mayes, Jonathan Lamont Mayes and others
Plaintiff:
TY EVANS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.