Cases 31 - 40 of 769
HILL v. SCOTT
as 3:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
LARRY E. HILL
Defendant:
COREY L. SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv01411
Plaintiff:
Kelly A Lee
Defendant:
Matt Smith, Woodford County Illinois, Dennis Wertz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benson v. York et al
as 2:2023cv01472
Plaintiff:
Corey Benson
Defendant:
C York, L Wilson, R Hepp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. Tucek et al
as 2:2023cv01370
Plaintiff:
Shanterrica Johnson and Shanquil Lashay Bey
Defendant:
David Tucek, Jr, Brad T Caddock, Corey P Lozano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bragg v. Peoria County Sheriff et al
as 1:2023cv01394
Plaintiff:
Corey W Bragg
Defendant:
Peoria County Sheriff and Peoria County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maclin-Carney v. Maloney et al
as 2:2023cv02229
Plaintiff:
Ademeko Maclin-Carney
Defendant:
Corey Maloney, . Renfro, Macon County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RONDEAU et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01749
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RONDEAU, BRADY TURNER, CORY GRAY and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SACKS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv01676
Plaintiff:
COREY M. SACKS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Armstrong v. The United States Federal Government et al
as 4:2023cv04139
Plaintiff:
Ryan Christopher Armstrong
Defendant:
The United States Federal Government, The State of Illinois, Kwame Raoul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
GREEN v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv01642
Petitioner:
COREY GREEN
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
