Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Young-Smith v. Holt et al
as 3:2012cv00275
Plaintiff:
Yolanda D Young-Smith
Defendant:
Rebecca A Holt , Stephen A Yokich , Jamie L Standridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. BROWN
as 2:2012cv00066
Respondent:
DICK BROWN
Petitioner:
RAYLON D. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Randy Rindahl v. Dennis Daugaard, et al
as 11-3165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY RINDAHL
Defendant - Appellee:
DENNIS DAUGAARD, Governor of the State of South Dakota, TIM REISCH, Former State Corrections Secretary, DOUG WEBER, Warden of the South Dakota State Penitentiary and others
Randy Rindahl v. Dennis Daugaard, et al
as 11-3164
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY RINDAHL
Defendant - Appellee:
DENNIS DAUGAARD, Governor of the State of South Dakota, TIM REISCH, Former State Corrections Secretary, DOUG WEBER, Warden of the South Dakota State Penitentiary and others
Young et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 3:2011cv12126
Plaintiff:
Sharmon D. Young and Dwayne Young
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bayer Schering Pharma A G, Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rindahl v. Daugaard et al
as 2:2011cv00565
Plaintiff:
Randy Rindahl
Defendant:
Dennis Daugaard, Tim Reisch, D Weber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00767
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00489
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rindahl v. Daugaard et al
as 2:2011cv00337
Plaintiff:
Randy Rindahl
Defendant:
Dennis Daugaard, Marty Jackley, Aaron McGowan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Astrue
as 2:2011cv00307
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
John D Young, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
