Cases 31 - 40 of 255
Allan Walker v. Wexford of Indiana, LLC, et al
as 24-1222
Plaintiff:
ALLAN WALKER
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, DOCTOR MERONDIT, DOCTOR KEENZLY and others
Foor v. English et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Phillip Zachary Foor
Defendant:
English, Dentist, Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIAZ v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00584
Petitioner:
ROLANDO DIAZ
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL, ENGLISH, WADHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. ENGLISH et al
as 1:2023cv02164
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. JOHNSON
Defendant:
GASON ENGLISH, ARAMARK, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION'S and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryan Sheckles v. Brian English
as 23-3297
Petitioner / Appellant:
RYAN M. SHECKLES
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN ENGLISH
Ataul Shafeek v. Brian English
as 23-3347
Petitioner / Appellant:
ATAUL SHAFEEK
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN ENGLISH
Kirkland v. McCray et al
as 3:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Martize Kirkland
Defendant:
Justin McCray, Centuerion Health, Chad C. Crites and others
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. English et al
as 3:2023cv01085
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Johnson
Defendant:
Gason English, Aramark, Indiana Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ingram v. English et al
as 3:2023cv01001
Plaintiff:
Darrius L Ingram, Darrius Lamont Ingram, Darius L Ingram and others
Defendant:
Ryan English and Wells
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Serfort v. Kausar et al
as 1:2023cv01479
Plaintiff:
Eric Serfort
Defendant:
Dr Kausar, Dr English, Tony Gunderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
