Cases 31 - 40 of 204
GALE v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
SUSAN GALE and CHRISTIAN GALE
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rettkowski et al v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2021pq01773
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Gale Rettkowski and Patricia Rettkowski
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ross v. Ross
as 1:2021cv00464
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gale Ross
Defendant:
Ronda Rochelle Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GALE v. WATSON
as 2:2021cv00284
Petitioner:
BRIAN GALE
Respondent:
T.J. WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GALE v. WATSON et al
as 2:2021cv00275
Plaintiff:
BRIAN GALE
Defendant:
T. J. WATSON, WASSON, SCHMALENSEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cross v. Godfrey et al
as 1:2021cv00242
Defendant:
Steven Godfrey, Gale Lyn Palmer, Bart Arnold and others
Plaintiff:
Damien Cross and Damien Ray Cross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NFL Properties LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2021cv02237
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Champsringclub.com, Flyzones and others
Plaintiff:
NFL Properties LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00482
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
GALE v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv00130
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN GALE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GALE v. WATSON et al
as 2:2021cv00017
Respondent:
USP TERRE HAUTE, BOP and T. WATSON
Petitioner:
BRIAN GALE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
