Cases 31 - 40 of 424
Lewis v. Reily et al
as 1:2023cv02929
Plaintiff:
Robert Lewis
Defendant:
Elizabeth Reily, Eric Wojnruni, Jessica Sosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
HAMPTON v. WALMART
as 1:2023cv00524
Plaintiff:
DEIVORY HAMPTON
Defendant:
WALMART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
USA v. Alonzo Hampton
as 23-1505
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ALONZO RICKY HAMPTON
Hampton v. L'Oreal USA Inc et al
as 1:2023cv01552
Plaintiff:
Joy Hampton
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA Inc., L'oreal USA Products Inc and Soft Sheen-Carson LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hampton v. Collins et al
as 1:2023cv01195
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Hampton
Defendant:
Daniel A. Collins and The City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NAPIER v. RICHMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv00297
Plaintiff:
JAMES BLAKE NAPIER
Defendant:
RICHMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT, WILLIAM HAMPTON, KAYLA REICHNET and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In RE: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, And Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2023cv00818
In Re:
In RE: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, And Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
Mahogany Lee, Keaira Gamble, Jenny Mitchell and others
Defendant:
Kimberly Smith, L'Oreal USA, Inc, Soft Sheen Carson, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
