Cases 31 - 40 of 235
HUDEK v. REPUBLIC-FRANKLIN INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
ANN M. HUDEK
Defendant:
REPUBLIC-FRANKLIN INSURANCE COMPANY, UTICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, NORTH EAST TRAILER SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Smith v. Jackson Correctional Insitution
as 2:2022cv00485
Plaintiff:
Lontonio Jermaine Smith, Lontonio J Smith and Lontonio Smith
Defendant:
Jackson Correctional Insitution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv00790
Plaintiff:
Darnell Howard
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Alvin Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
MARSHALL v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2021cv02862
Plaintiff:
AUGUSTUS MARSHALL
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC., SEVIER, K. GRINSTEAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Whatley v. City of Chicago, et al
as 1:2021cv06056
Plaintiff:
Damarcus Whatley
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, Kazmi, Westerfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROPER v. TRIMBLE et al
as 2:2021cv00300
Plaintiff:
TALON L. ROPER
Defendant:
B. TRIMBLE, S. DECKER, T. LITTLEJOHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARDING v. KRISS et al
as 2:2021cv00289
Plaintiff:
STEVEN HARDING
Defendant:
KRISS, DUSHAN ZATECKY, ROBERT EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2021cv01930
Defendant:
D. REAGLE, BRAMBACH and BOLDMAN
Plaintiff:
AARON J. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Izariah Jump, et al v. Village of Shorewood, et al
as 21-2255
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IZARIAH JUMP and ESTATE OF JONAH MARCINIAK, by Special Administrator, Brenda Mroch
Defendant / Appellee:
VILLAGE OF SHOREWOOD, THOMAS LIEBENTHAL, Sergeant, CODY J. SMITH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
