Cases 31 - 40 of 78
Hoaglan et al v. Foster et al
as 2:2013cv01014
Plaintiff:
Estate of Craig King
Defendant:
Danielle Foster , William Golden , Sarah Kropp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gunderson v. Pharls et al
as 1:2013cv03792
Plaintiff:
Sean Gunderson
Defendant:
Jeff Pharls, Elgin Mental Health Center (EMHC), Paul Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Christian v. City of Springfield et al
as 3:2013cv03135
Plaintiff:
Calvin Christian, III
Defendant:
City of Springfield , Michelle Awe , C. Vollmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holbrook v. Kankakee County et al
as 2:2012cv02215
Plaintiff:
Douglas Holbrook
Defendant:
Kankakee County, Timothy F Bukowski, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walton v. City of Jacksonville et al
as 1:2012cv01251
Plaintiff:
Bamako Walton
Defendant:
City of Jacksonville, Rodney Cox, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hemphill v. City of Milwaukee et al
as 2:2011cv00743
Plaintiff:
Dorothy A Hemphill
Defendant:
City of Milwaukee , Craig Ellis and Jane Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Horseshoe Hammond LLC et al
as 2:2010cv00317
Plaintiff:
Katrina Williams
Defendant:
Horseshoe Hammond LLC , John Doe and Jane Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
R. v. WILLIAM PENN ELEMENTARY #49 et al
as 1:2010cv00535
Defendant:
RHONDA AKERS, JANE DOE, INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS and others
Plaintiff:
J. R.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Westfield Insurance Company v. Hill et al
as 2:2010cv00123
Plaintiff:
Westfield Insurance Company
Defendant:
Robert H Hill, Mildred F Hill and Jane Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Brown v. Bowman et al
as 1:2009cv00346
Plaintiff:
Bryan J Brown
Defendant:
Elizabeth Bowman, Terry Harrell, Tim Sudrovech and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
