Cases 31 - 40 of 104
Rivers v. Doe et al
as 2:2019cv02033
Defendant:
John Doe, II, Tony Brasel, . Elliot and others
Plaintiff:
Mario J Rivers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castleberry v. Dorethy et al
as 4:2019cv04021
Defendant:
Collen, Stepanie Dorethy, John Doe, I and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Castleberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delices v. Board of Regents et al
as 2:2018cv01839
Plaintiff:
Patrick Delices
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe II, Johannes Britz, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doe I et al v. Illinois Business Consulting Inc
as 2:2018cv02227
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe I and John Doe I
Defendant:
University of Illinois, Whitney Smith, Eric Swenson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Eubanks v. Doe I et al
as 1:2018cv05609
Plaintiff:
Darrick Eubanks, Sr.
Defendant:
John Doe III, John Doe I, Seneh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jane Doe, et al v. Shawn Loomi
as 18-2052
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JANE DOE, I - IV and JOHN DOE, I and II
Defendant - Appellant:
SHAWN LOOMIS
Brandon v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2018cv01137
Plaintiff:
Fabian Brandon
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Marcus Hardy, Michael P Melvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe I v. Illinois Business Consulting, Inc.
as 1:2017cv08767
Plaintiff:
John Doe I
Defendant:
University Of Illinois, d/b/a Illinois Business Consulting, Jeffery R. Brown, individually, Whitney Smith, individually and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Coffee v. Melvin et al
as 1:2017cv01297
Plaintiff:
Lazerrick Coffee
Defendant:
Michael Melvin, Terry Kennedy, Emily Ruskin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryce et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2017cv00417
Plaintiff:
Maureen O. Bryce and Charles Bryce
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Zimmer Biomet , Biomet Orthopedics LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
