Cases 31 - 40 of 21,003
Shrum, Joseph v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Shrum
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Robert L. Berrios v. USA
as 24-1965
Petitioner:
ROBERT L. BERRIOS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lewis, Daniel v. Stafford, Bridgette et al
as 3:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
Daniel F.W. Lewis
Defendant:
Bridgette L. Stafford, Rey R. Palop, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Meador
as 2:2024cv02122
Plaintiff:
Tracy L Parker
Defendant:
Jon Rodney Meador
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Union Labor Life Insurance Company, The v. Finney et al
as 3:2024cv50208
Plaintiff:
Union Labor Life Insurance Company, The
Defendant:
Heather Kathleen Finney, Jamie L. Branch, Royce Branch and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Andrews v. Horizon Therapeutics USA, Inc.
as 1:2024cv04461
Plaintiff:
Sandra L. Andrews
Defendant:
Horizon Therapeutics USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fenderson v. Helfrich et al
as 1:2024cv01200
Plaintiff:
Amos Fenderson
Defendant:
Payton Helfrich, Christian Munoz, Russell Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYANT v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
COREY L. BRYANT
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Long Term Disability Income Plan of Bank of Montreal/Harris et al
as 2:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
Kari L. Brown
Defendant:
Long Term Disability Income Plan of Bank of Montreal/Harris and BMO Financial Corp. Benefits Administration Committee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
