Cases 31 - 40 of 412
MARSHALL v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE, INDIANA et al
as 3:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
DYLAN MARSHALL
Defendant:
CITY OF EVANSVILLE, INDIANA, EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, SAM SEDORIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARSHALL v. ELEVANCE HEALTH, INC.
as 1:2023cv01326
Plaintiff:
SHONTAY MARSHALL
Defendant:
ELEVANCE HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Evangelista v. United States Marshals Headquarters
as 1:2023cv00307
Plaintiff:
Wayne Richard Evangelista
Defendant:
United States Marshals Headquarters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
COBB v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2023cv01216
Petitioner:
MARSHALL COBB, SR.
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hecke v. Beck et al
as 1:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
Steven John Hecke
Defendant:
Richard Beck, David Gladieux, David Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foundation for Underprivileged Children Trust v. Kosciusko County et al
as 3:2023cv00590
Plaintiff:
Foundation for Underprivileged Children Trust
Defendant:
Kosciusko County, Kosciusko County Sheriff and Marshall County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARSHALL v. BYRD et al
as 1:2023cv01049
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN MARSHALL
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, HEATHER, MAKAYLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Mallot
as 3:2023cv00533
Plaintiff:
Shawn Marshall
Defendant:
Mallot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL et al v. CAPITOLONE, N.A. et al
as 1:2023cv00914
Plaintiff:
SHAWN MARSHALL and AMELIA TURNER
Defendant:
CAPITOLONE, N.A. and SEAN HORRIDGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
MARSHALL v. ANDIS et al
as 1:2023cv00781
Plaintiff:
SHAWN MARSHALL
Defendant:
ANDIS, RAFFENBERGER and KAFFENBERGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
