Cases 31 - 40 of 1,368
Reed v. Abbott Laboratories
as 1:2023cv16903
Plaintiff:
Tyra Reed
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Janiah Monroe, et al v. Steven Bowman, et al
as 23-3371
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JANIAH MONROE, MARILYN MELENDEZ, LYDIA H. VISION and others
Defendant / Appellant:
STEVEN BOWMAN, MELVIN HINTON and LATOYA HUGHES
Reed v. The Schaumburg Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv16652
Plaintiff:
Darrell Reed
Defendant:
The Schaumburg Police Department, M. Sullivan, Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Truitt et al
as 1:2023cv16620
Plaintiff:
Gregory Reed
Defendant:
Charles Truitt and Kenneth Osborne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawley v. Cook County et al
as 1:2023cv16490
Plaintiff:
Christopher Crawley
Defendant:
COOK COUNTY, a municipal corporation,, Floyd Reed, Samuel Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reed v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv16230
Plaintiff:
Sydney Reed
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Carlos Vega and Unknown Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REED v. PRATT
as 2:2023cv00533
Plaintiff:
JAMES KENNETH REED
Defendant:
DONNA PRATT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reed v. Morgenthaler et al
as 3:2023cv03720
Plaintiff:
Arnold Reed
Defendant:
Richard Morgenthaler, Kimberly Hvarre, Rob Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMS v. JENSEN et al
as 2:2023cv00523
Plaintiff:
JOHN SIMS
Defendant:
JENSEN, YARBER, TAWNI TEMPLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Hawk v. Reed et al
as 3:2023cv00974
Plaintiff:
Scotty Lee Van Hawk and Scotty Van Hawk
Defendant:
Michael Reed, Indiana State of and Kosciusko County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
