Cases 31 - 40 of 210
Campbell v. American Multi-Cinema et al
as 3:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Rochelle Campbell, as Parent and Next Friend of Rakyra Thomas and Rochelle Campbell
Defendant:
American Multi-Cinema, Michigan City, Michigan City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3217
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miller v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2022pq02818
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Rochelle Miller
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McCray v. Melchor et al
as 1:2022cv01423
Plaintiff:
Rochelle McCray
Defendant:
Hector Melchor, Stephen Brown, Kerri Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hare v. Tharp et al
as 3:2022cv02281
Plaintiff:
Keith L. Hare
Defendant:
Kristopher Tharp, Rochelle Brown and Mary Dambacher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zarnoth v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv01151
Plaintiff:
Rochelle A Zarnoth
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Michels v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv01137
Plaintiff:
Rochelle L Michels
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Clark et al v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2022cv04778
Plaintiff:
Maureen E Clark, Rochelle M Maly, James R Stirn and others
Defendant:
J.B. Pritzker and Illinois State Board of Elections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Romano v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv03679
Plaintiff:
Rochelle Romano
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
