Cases 31 - 40 of 257
Rowe Jr v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv01645
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Rowe Jr
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Cook County Cleaning Staffs and C/O Correa/Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. DELAWARE COUNTY SHERIFF TONY SKINNER et al
as 1:2022cv00274
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD DAVIS
Defendant:
DELAWARE COUNTY SHERIFF TONY SKINNER, CITY OF MUNCIE, HARLEY PAGEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rowe-Tews v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Linda Rowe-Tews
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jeffrey Rowe v. Ron Neal
as 22-1099
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEFFREY A. ROWE
Respondent / Appellee:
RON NEAL
Rowe v. Gladieux
as 1:2022cv00013
Plaintiff:
Paul T. L. Rowe and Paul T Rowe
Defendant:
David Gladieux, Allen County Sheriffs Dptm. and Allen County Jail and Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rowe et al v. Chilla
as 1:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
John Rowe and Jeanne Rowe
Defendant:
Charles Chilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Rowe Marketing, LLC v. Kaz USA, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
Rowe Marketing, LLC
Defendant:
Kaz USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EDWARDS v. GRAND COMMANDER SOVEREIGN PLAINTIFF OF UNIVERSAL FREEMASONRY et al
as 1:2021cv03110
Plaintiff:
AHMAD EDWARDS
Defendant:
GRAND COMMANDER SOVEREIGN PLAINTIFF OF UNIVERSAL FREEMASONRY, PALMYRA REFLECTOR, NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC IN STUDIES OF ALL DOCUMENTARY EXPERTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Szpila v. Elliott et al
as 2:2021cv02304
Plaintiff:
Rhyian Szpila
Defendant:
. Elliott, Jim Rowe, Benjamin Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowe v. Dambra et al
as 1:2021cv00431
Plaintiff:
Paul T. L. Rowe
Defendant:
G Dambra and M A Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
