Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 177
The Estate of Gavin Wallmow v. Oneida County We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00241
Plaintiff: The Estate of Gavin Wallmow
Defendant: Oneida County, Glenn Kortenhof, Ian Conkey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kim v. Rudolph et al
as 3:2022cv00370
Plaintiff: Kenneth Kim
Defendant: John Austin Rudolph and Collaku Enea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
DeVost v. Davis et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv03010
Plaintiff: Melvin DeVost
Defendant: Dale Davis, Joshua Davis, Matthew Dowis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kim v. Rudolph et al
as 1:2022cv00100
Plaintiff: Kenneth Kim
Defendant: John Austin Rudolph and Collaku Enea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00487
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Haladyna v. Ciolli
as 3:2021cv50235
Petitioner: Rudolph Haladyna
Respondent: Andrew Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CROOKS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv01265
Plaintiff: JOHN RUDOLPH CROOKS
Defendant: COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rudolph v. Target Corporation
as 1:2021cv02558
Plaintiff: Marissa Rudolph
Defendant: Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ANDERSON et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv01146
Defendant: CRAWFORD, RUDOLPH, UNKNOWN OFFICERS WORKING 2-D THIS DATE and others
Plaintiff: JAMARRIS LEWIS, STEPHEN HUTCHINSON, JAMES GRIFFIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of E.H. et al v. Manitowoc County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00502
Plaintiff: Anthony Hauschultz, A. H., A. H., Jr. and others
Defendant: Lane Kinzel, Christy Torrison, ABC Defendants and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?