Cases 31 - 40 of 919
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A v. Maxwell et al
as 1:2022cv06467
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A
Defendant:
Courtney Maxwell and MIDSTATE CONCRETE AND MASONRY INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
McClain et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al
as 2:2022cv01284
Plaintiff:
Robert McClain and Delois McClain
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank NA and Focus Title LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Wilson et al v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
as 1:2022cv05680
Plaintiff:
Betty Wilson and Darrel Wilson
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank and McCalla Raymer Leibert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ysrael v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2022cv04729
Plaintiff:
Yahkeskyah Ysrael
Defendant:
State of Illinois, James Carroll, Louis J Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Nice Services, Inc.
as 1:2022cv04726
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Nice Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Forward Space, LLC
as 1:2022cv02980
Plaintiff:
Forward Space LLP and Forward Space, LLC
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
