Cases 31 - 40 of 86
WESTBROOK v. SHERIFF OF DELAWARE COUNTY et al
as 1:2018cv01604
Defendant:
ANTHONY FORD, TERRI HAMILTON, CHRIS HOOSE and others
Recruited Counsel:
Mark E. Miller
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. WESTBROOK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv09367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gully v. Dart et al
as 1:2017cv06992
Plaintiff:
Bernard Gully
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Dr. Jones, S. Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bronson Westbrook v. $14,610.00 in United States Cu
as 17-1981
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellant:
BRONSON T. WESTBROOK
Defendant:
$14,610.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02913
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ford v. Mateo et al
as 1:2016cv08855
Plaintiff:
Denzel Ford
Defendant:
Eric Mateo, Matthew Pasko, Lucas Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peoples et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00847
Plaintiff:
Timothy Peoples , Elijah Reedy , Michael Nichols and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanders et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00628
Plaintiff:
Pierre Sanders , Everton Johnson , Darrell Cottman and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mohammad v. McGrath et al
as 1:2016cv04913
Plaintiff:
Mansour Mohammad
Defendant:
Sergeant McGrath, Officer Mason, Officer Westbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1802
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
