Cases 41 - 50 of 320
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ELLIS v. NYIEDYE et al
as 1:2022cv02481
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO JEROME ELLIS
Defendant:
NYIEDYE, KRUL, LAWSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRAZIER v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv02466
Plaintiff:
JASPER FRAZIER
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, CHRISTINA REAGLE, BOB BUGHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIVERS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv02417
Plaintiff:
JESSICA L RIVERS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MELTON v. PERRY et al
as 3:2022cv00191
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN MELTON
Defendant:
JARED PERRY, JESSICA PERRY and DEPT CHILD SERV
Consolidated Defendant:
JULIE WEEKS, STEPHANIE GILMOUR and BRITTANY CLARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
MOOTOO v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv06935
Plaintiff:
JESSICA MOOTOO
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MELTON v. PERRY et al
as 3:2022cv00184
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN MELTON
Defendant:
JARED PERRY, JESSICA PERRY, STEPHANIE GILMOUR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
MELTON v. PERRY et al
as 1:2022cv02148
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN MELTON
Defendant:
JARED PERRY, JESSICA PERRY and DEPT CHILD SERV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
MARTIN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00470
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILMORE, THOMAS WELLINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
