Cases 41 - 50 of 13,411
THOMAS v. GOFFINET et al
as 2:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
GENTLE THOMAS, JR.
Defendant:
LUCY GOFFINET and T. PARKER HUDSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas, Jr. v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Gentle Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Not Yet Classified:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhodus, Jr. v. Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC
as 3:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Thomas R. Rhodus, Jr.
Defendant:
Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
LAMPLEY v. BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 3:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
TOMMY LAMPLEY
Defendant:
BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, COMMISSIONER OF I.D.O.C., KYLE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv04199
Plaintiff:
Pierre Lamar Garrett
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Pollock and Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Anthony Harris v. County of Cook, et al
as 24-1878
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HARRIS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF COOK, THOMAS J. DART, LIEUTENANT DELITZ and others
Thomas Powers v. Krista Wilcoxen, et al
as 24-1885
Plaintiff:
THOMAS POWERS
Defendant:
KRISTA WILCOXEN, GREGG SCOTT and JANE OR JOHN DOE
Coleman v. Melcher et al
as 1:2024cv01186
Plaintiff:
Thomas Coleman
Defendant:
Melcher and Illinois State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
