Cases 41 - 50 of 121
Cassidy Green v. Jason Edgcomb
as 19-3039
Petitioner / Appellant:
CASSIDY J. GREEN
Respondent / Appellee:
JASON EDGCOMB
In the Matter of the Complaint of John Jones, et al
as 1:2019cv01430
Plaintiff:
Mr. John Jones, Cassidy Jones and John Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Green v. Edgcomb et al
as 1:2019cv04261
Plaintiff:
Cassidy J. Green
Defendant:
Sheriff Thomas J. Templeton
Respondent:
Jason Edgcomb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
People of the State of IL v. Cassidy Green
as 19-2137
Defendant / Appellant:
CASSIDY J. GREEN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
Morgan et al v. Williams et al
as 2:2019cv02143
Defendant:
Shayne Cassidy, Dennis Gardner, Michael Maria and others
Plaintiff:
William Morgan and Paul Farrow, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram, Milton v. Laufenberg, M. et al
as 3:2019cv00430
Defendant:
RN Cassidy, Warden Matthew Marske and M. Laufenberg
Plaintiff:
Milton Eugene Ingram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02105
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SMITH et al v. SAINT PAUL TRAVELERS COMPANY INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00598
Defendant:
BOB STELLER, MOBILE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT INC., EDDIE CURRAN and others
Plaintiff:
EDMOND HUDMOND SMITH, IV and LOUIS HOLGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Monster Energy Company v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2019cv00551
Plaintiff:
Monster Energy Company
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", seven.summer, James Felton and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Green v. LaSalle Co. Sheriff Dept. et al
as 1:2019cv00425
Defendant:
Ypolito Salinas, "John" Rutherford, Rhonda "Doe" and others
Plaintiff:
Cassidy J. Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
