Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 41 - 50 of 287
BOUYE v. REGAL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv02661
Plaintiff: BRADFORD DEAN BOUYE, JR.
Defendant: DENNIS REGAL, COCHRAN and CONYERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWSLEY v. GORBETT et al
as 1:2015cv00552
Plaintiff: LOGAN A. OWSLEY
Defendant: MARK E. GORBETT, ERNEST DEWAYNE JANES, SR., DEAN A. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Carter et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00687
Plaintiff: Timothy Dean Anderson
Defendant: Robert E Carter, Ron Neal, C Fredianelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deane v. Neal We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00539
Plaintiff: Stephen M Deane
Defendant: Ron Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RYAN v. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC
as 4:2021cv00111
Plaintiff: DEAN RYAN
Defendant: LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ASHLOCK v ROGATNICK et al
as 2:2021cv00286
Defendant: WALTER BRYAN ASHLOCK, ROGATNICK, CINDY MCGEE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SNOWDEN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2021cv00299
Plaintiff: OREN SNOWDEN
Defendant: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, B. LAMMER, J DEAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FARMER v. HAMMOND POLICE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01636
Plaintiff: JEREMIAH S. FARMER
Defendant: CHRISTISON, ANTHONY ADAMS, DANIAL MITTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RICHARDSON v. SAUL
as 3:2021cv00093
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff: LARRY DEAN RICHARDSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BROWN v. MOATS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00240
Defendant: WILLIAM E. WILSON, DR. TRUEBLOOD, MARK D. JACKSON and others
Plaintiff: RAYMOND DEAN BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?