Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Engles v. Sherman Hospital
as 1:2012cv00070
Plaintiff:
Michael C Engles
Defendant:
Sherman Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Engle v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv11024
Plaintiff:
Kelly Engle
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Healthcare LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
U.S. Bank National Association v. Engle et al
as 3:2011cv00060
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
Clarence Engle, Susan Engle, Midland Credit Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simpson v. Engle et al
as 1:2010cv01394
Plaintiff:
Kevin Simpson
Defendant:
Jeffrey Engle, Bloomington Police Department and City of Bloomington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
HUNTER v. ENGLE et al
as 1:2010cv01224
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, OFFICER SARAH ENGLE, OFFICER JOSHUA KEMMERLING and others
Plaintiff:
ROBYN HUNTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Husnik v. Engles et al
as 2:2010cv00781
Plaintiff:
Travis James Husnik
Defendant:
Corporal Engles , Officer Nies, Officer Leyndecker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cenveo, Inc. v. Engle et al
as 1:2010cv00811
Plaintiff:
Cenveo, Inc. and Cenveo, Inc.
Defendant:
Tim Engle and United Envelope, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Bank of America N.A. v. Engle
as 1:2009cv05282
Plaintiff:
Bank of America N.A.
Defendant:
Clyde W. Engle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Engles v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2008cv00914
Plaintiff:
Michael Engles
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Ray v. MARTINEZ et al
as 3:2008cv00069
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Ray
Defendant:
RICHARDO MARTINEZ, Richard Engle, SHOOK, ASSISTANT WARDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
