Cases 41 - 50 of 85
Cazares v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2019cv07856
Defendant:
La Shawnda Bishiop, Kwame Raoul, Chicago Public Schools and others
Plaintiff:
Avangelina V Cazares and Josue J Turcios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rivera v. Vandalia City Police Department et al
as 3:2019cv00341
Defendant:
Fayette County Court, Vandalia City Police Department and Judge Kelly
Plaintiff:
Arnold Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWLING v. CANTRELL et al
as 1:2019cv01196
Defendant:
ERIC CANTRELL, STEVE BILLS, FAYETTE COUNTY WORK RELEASE and others
Plaintiff:
DAMON BOWLING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AMMERMAN v. LAUGHLIN
as 1:2019cv00921
Plaintiff:
David L Ammerman and DAVID AMMERMAN
Defendant:
Fayette County Sheriff Joey Laughlin and JOEY LAUGHLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Maness v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv02021
Defendant:
Fayette County Illinois, Chris Smith, U.S. Congressional Court and others
Plaintiff:
Nick Maness
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CREECH v. FAYETTE COUNTY et al
as 1:2018cv02419
Respondent:
FAYETTE COUNTY and STATE OF INDIANA
Petitioner:
BRENT D. CREECH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CITY OF CONNERSVILLE and FAYETTE COUNTY v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv00175
Defendant:
ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., ACTAVIS, LLC, ALLERGAN PLC and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF CONNERSVILLE and FAYETTE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Tedrick v. Fayette County Jail et al
as 3:2017cv01031
Plaintiff:
Jacob D. Tedrick
Defendant:
Fayette County Jail, Tyler Butts, Jon Torbeck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowlin v. Torbeck et al
as 3:2017cv00972
Plaintiff:
James W. Bowlin, Jr.
Defendant:
Jon Torbeck, Tylor Butts, Bryan Glidden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
