Cases 41 - 50 of 92
Clark v. Wexford et al
as 1:2018cv01367
Defendant:
J. Davis, Molinero, Fikes and others
Plaintiff:
Kalvin Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moffett, Walter et al v. Dittman, Michael et al
as 3:2018cv00656
Defendant:
Cynthia Neuhauser, Welzel, Ziggler and others
Undetermined:
CCI Prison Facility
Plaintiff:
Walter J.D. Moffett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNETT v. THE FINISH LINE, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv01580
Plaintiff:
COREY BARNETT
Defendant:
TORRENCE BOONE, WILLIAM P. CARMICHAEL, RICHARD P. CRYSTAL and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
MILLER v. THE FINISH LINE, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv01542
Defendant:
TORRENCE BOONE, WILLIAM P. CARMICHAEL, RICHARD P. CRYSTAL and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN M. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
FRANCHI v. THE FINISH LINE, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv01434
Defendant:
TORRENCE BOONE, WILLIAM P. CARMICHAEL, RICHARD P. CRYSTAL and others
Plaintiff:
ADAM FRANCHI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MARTINEZ v. LYON et al
as 1:2018cv01342
Defendant:
TORRENCE BOONE, WILLIAM P. CARMICHAEL, RICHARD P. CRYSTAL and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD MARTINEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Poventud v. Saldaris et al
as 2:2018cv00532
Plaintiff:
Eliezer A Poventud
Defendant:
Gayle S Saldaris , Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Bohannan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler et al v. Moreland et al
as 1:2017cv01323
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Butler
Defendant:
. Moreland, . Gish, . Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scheffel v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2017cv01945
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Scheffel
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, David Oglesby, Cleactric Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goldsmith v. Kim et al
as 1:2017cv00256
Plaintiff:
Robert Goldsmith
Defendant:
Kim, Jennifer Briscoe and Correct Care Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
