Cases 41 - 50 of 91
Jackson v. Kell et al
as 3:2019cv00025
Defendant:
Peter Kell and Jackson County Jail
Plaintiff:
Isaac Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WOODRING v. JACKSON COUNTY, INDIANA
as 4:2018cv00243
Defendant:
JACKSON COUNTY, INDIANA
Plaintiff:
REBECCA WOODRING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACOBS v. JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2018cv00185
Plaintiff:
Anita Jacobs
Defendant:
JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and CITY OF SEYMOUR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson County Bank v. Mathew DuSablon
as 18-2809
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JACKSON COUNTY BANK
Defendant - Appellant:
MATHEW R. DUSABLON
Jackson v. Jackson County Jail et al
as 3:2018cv01414
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service and Jackson County Jail
Plaintiff:
Isaac Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON COUNTY BANK v. DUSABLON
as 1:2018cv01346
Counter Claimant:
MATHEW R DUSABLON and MATHEW R DUSABLON
Defendant:
MATHEW R DUSABLON
Counter Defendant:
JACKSON COUNTY BANK and JACKSON COUNTY BANK
Plaintiff:
JACKSON COUNTY BANK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
JACKSON COUNTY, INDIANA v. AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION et al
as 4:2018cv00054
Defendant:
ACTAVIS LLC, ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., ALLERGAN PLC and others
Plaintiff:
JACKSON COUNTY, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
THOMAS v. FOSTER et al
as 4:2018cv00032
Defendant:
JOEY BARRIS, JAUSH CLARK, DERICK FOSTER and others
Plaintiff:
WAYMAN D. THOMAS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAGELS v. JACKSON COUNTY JAIL
as 4:2018cv00005
Defendant:
JACKSON COUNTY JAIL
Plaintiff:
ERNEST PAGELI and ERNEST PAGELS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson County v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 2:2017cv01544
Plaintiff:
Jackson County
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma LP, Purdue Pharma Inc, Purdue Frederick Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
