Cases 41 - 50 of 2,164
REAMER v. MITCHELL
as 1:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
ADAM REAMER
Defendant:
BRADEN MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell Burton v. USA
as 24-1460
Petitioner:
MITCHELL C. BURTON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Joseph v. AFAM Concept Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02178
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth R Joseph
Defendant:
AFAM Concept Inc. dba JF Labs Inc., Avlon Industries, Inc., Beauty Bell Enterprises, LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mitchell Tischauser, et al v. Mode Transportation LLC, et al
as 24-1392
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL TISCHAUSER, DELOS W. LUEDTKE and PADEN ROTHENBERGER
Defendant:
MODE TRANSPORTATION LLC and SYSCO CORPORATION
Mitchell Tischauser v. Sysco Corporation, et al
as 24-1395
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL TISCHAUSER
Defendant:
SYSCO CORPORATION and MODE TRANSPORTATION LLC
Davis v. Casasantos et al
as 1:2024cv02103
Plaintiff:
Mitchell B Davis
Defendant:
Detective Daniel Casasantos, Kim Fox, Darryl Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Milwaukee Circuit Court
as 2:2024cv00295
Petitioner:
Mitchell D Green
Respondent:
Milwaukee Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Thompson v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2024cv01883
Plaintiff:
Walter Thompson
Defendant:
JB Pritzker, Latoya Hughes, David Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2024pq00652
Plaintiff:
Thelma L. Mitchell
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Munson v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
James Munson
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Steve Meeks, David Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
