Cases 41 - 50 of 111
Templeton v. Saul
as 1:2020cv06986
Plaintiff:
Jaylan Templeton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Soc Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
PERRY v. ZATECKY et al
as 1:2019cv04916
Plaintiff:
RODNEY S. PERRY, SR.
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, B. RICHEY and A. TEMPLETON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Edgcomb et al
as 1:2019cv04261
Plaintiff:
Cassidy J. Green
Defendant:
Sheriff Thomas J. Templeton
Respondent:
Jason Edgcomb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Heth v. LaSalle County et al
as 1:2019cv01096
Defendant:
Ypolito Salinas, Dr. Rozel Elazagui, Sheriff Thomas J. Templeton and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Heth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. LaSalle Co. Sheriff Dept. et al
as 1:2019cv00425
Defendant:
Ypolito Salinas, "John" Rutherford, Rhonda "Doe" and others
Plaintiff:
Cassidy J. Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Askew v. LaSalle County et al
as 1:2019cv00280
Defendant:
Ronald Marconi, DREW LENGFELDER, Thomas Templeton and others
Plaintiff:
ZANDREA ASKEW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reimann v. Templeton et al
as 1:2019cv00142
Defendant:
Jennifer "Doe", LaSalle Co. Sheriff Dept., "John" Armstrong and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Reimann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Godfrey et al v. Greatbanc Trust Company et al
as 1:2018cv07918
Defendant:
McBride & Son Capital, Inc., Michael D Arri, McBride & Son Management Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Sheldon and Gregory Godfrey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
WIMBERLY v. FEATHERSTON et al
as 2:2018cv00473
Defendant:
MICHELLE ENGLADE, WILLIAM BARLOW, TEXAS REGION EXECUTIVE OFF. and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMY WIMBERLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DEBOARD v. TEMPLETON RIDGE ONE, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv02695
Defendant:
TEMPLETON RIDGE, LLC, REDWOOD ACQUISITION, LLC and TEMPLETON RIDGE ONE, LLC
Plaintiff:
DAVID DEBOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
