Cases 41 - 50 of 320
Knox v. Bebout et al
as 3:2023cv01759
Plaintiff:
Ted Knox
Defendant:
Sgt. Bebout, Danny Lee, A. Dearmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv02629
Plaintiff:
Tina Freeman
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, Michele A Wood, Jose Almanza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Shlachter v. Moto Zone, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01340
Plaintiff:
Ted Shlachter
Defendant:
Moto Zone, Inc. and Beilan Mohanad
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Brisco et al
as 1:2023cv00943
Defendant:
Fredirick Safranko, Marucs Todd Brisco, Yas Castellum LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Receiver:
Kelly M. Crawford
Abdon v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2022pq03079
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Ted Abdon
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Huerta v. Ruff et al
as 2:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
CESAR HUERTA
Defendant:
TED RUFF, AMERICAS SERVICE LINE, LLC and America's Service Line, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
Galen Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
McNulty v. Glorioso et al
as 2:2022cv01139
Plaintiff:
Ned Charles McNulty, II
Defendant:
Ted Glorioso and Doe Security Guard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
